| 1 |
On Tue, 2020-06-23 at 19:58 +0200, Patrick Lauer wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 2020-06-23 19:34, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 3 |
> > > and we |
| 4 |
> > > might even reduce the amount of active EAPIs even more so that there's |
| 5 |
> > > fewer surprises |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > Are you going to achieve that by committing more ebuilds using |
| 8 |
> > deprecated EAPIs? |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> Ah damn it must feel good to yell at people. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I'm not yelling. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> I know what you mean, you know what you mean, everyone else is most |
| 16 |
> likely confused. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
I'm sorry that it wasn't clear, though I find your response really hard |
| 20 |
to comprehend. I'm going to clarify what I meant. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
You're running for a political position. As part of your agenda you're |
| 23 |
indicating you'd like to see fewer EAPIs around. As you probably know, |
| 24 |
there's quite a few developers that are actively working towards |
| 25 |
removing old EAPIs, and I'm one of them. I just happen to know that |
| 26 |
you've just committed an EAPI=5 ebuild last week, for no good reason. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
So to me it seems that your actions contradict your promises. In other |
| 29 |
words, in my opinion you're straight lying in your manifesto. I really |
| 30 |
dislike this kind of attitude, so I consider it appropriate to point it |
| 31 |
out publicly. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
If you don't want your actions criticized publicly, I would suggest you |
| 34 |
don't run for public positions. Council positions imply responsibility |
| 35 |
in front of all developers. Including these you don't like. I also |
| 36 |
feel like it also implies being able to behave professionally in face of |
| 37 |
criticism but this doesn't seem to be a case for a long time now. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
Best regards, |
| 41 |
Michał Górny |
Archives