Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] call for agenda items -- council meeting 2019-04-14
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 16:47:28
Message-Id: 20190414194720.76ded9f12d7825411781df2d@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] call for agenda items -- council meeting 2019-04-14 by "Michał Górny"
On Sun, 14 Apr 2019 18:41:13 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 2019-04-14 at 19:13 +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > On Sun, 14 Apr 2019 11:48:06 -0400 Aaron Bauman wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 06:28:15PM +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > > > On Sun, 14 Apr 2019 16:11:50 +0200 Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > > > > > > I support the idea of Gentoo being more inclusive. > > > > > > > > > > Can we please keep irrelevant buzzwords out? > > > > > > > > There is nothing irrelevant here. Gentoo is kicking people who > > > > want to contribute because doesn't want to respect their privacy > > > > because of some imaginary problems which were never appeared or > > > > tested in real life. This makes Gentoo exclusive to those who want > > > > their authorship to be public. > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > Andrew Savchenko > > > > > > Andrew, it is not imaginary. Playing the emotional game doesn't help > > > either. I am fairly certain all of those who had to make this decision > > > have expressed their willingness to change it should it be supported > > > legally. It simply is not. > > > > If it is not imaginary please provide a court case against Gentoo > > or other free software distribution on this matter and some > > evidence that proposed signed-off real name attribution played a > > measurable effect. > > > > As far as I can see this whole story is pure speculation of: > > 1) what may happen > > 2) what will help if 1) is to happen. > > > > So far I saw zero practical evidence on both points. > > So to summarize, you're claiming that you're allowed to do anything > as long as the other person can't prove somebody has already been > punished for the same thing? I suppose that's a pretty interesting > concept of law.
Do not twist my words. I'm asking for either a court case or an exact citation of the law which demands us to provide real names for all commits. Best regards, Andrew Savchenko