1 |
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 10:13 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. |
2 |
<wlt-ml@××××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> Something has to lead all the pieces into one cohesive Gentoo. |
4 |
> |
5 |
> If every piece is left to lead its own, you have a mess. You have what Gentoo |
6 |
> has become without Daniel or any Lead... |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Something has to bring everything together and lead the unified direction. |
9 |
> |
10 |
|
11 |
You do realize that Gentoo is about choice, right? |
12 |
|
13 |
We're a volunteer based organization. The only way you can truly have |
14 |
a unified direction is by forbidding people from doing things that |
15 |
aren't aligned with that direction. You can't force people to move |
16 |
forward, you can only block them from moving backwards. |
17 |
|
18 |
If a volunteer wants to invest in eudev, great. If they want to |
19 |
invest in udev, great. If they want to invest in systemd, great. We |
20 |
don't pick winners. |
21 |
|
22 |
Now what we do impose is reasonable order to ensure that these kinds |
23 |
of efforts play nicely together. We don't force devs to work on |
24 |
things they don't want to, but we also set guidelines so that others |
25 |
who do want to work on those things can work on changes to individual |
26 |
packages to make them work. If somebody wants to tweak some ebuilds |
27 |
to support multilib in accordance with an agreed-upon plan, they can. |
28 |
If somebody wants to add Prefix support to an ebuild, they can. If |
29 |
somebody wants to add a systemd or openrc unit/script to a package, |
30 |
they can. |
31 |
|
32 |
And as a result we support a lot of things that other distros don't. |
33 |
|
34 |
Now, does that mean that we support the things that any random person |
35 |
thinks we ought to? No. As many have pointed out our java support |
36 |
has been suffering. Ultimately though this requires people to step up |
37 |
and contribute in this area, not some kind of global initiative. |
38 |
|
39 |
And again it isn't like Council members don't step up and try to lead |
40 |
changes. We just don't claim any particular monopoly on doing so, and |
41 |
we're more than happy to endorse changes others are trying to make if |
42 |
it will help them achieve their goals. |
43 |
|
44 |
-- |
45 |
Rich |