1 |
On 2014.05.10 15:51, Markos Chandras wrote: |
2 |
> On 05/10/2014 03:30 PM, Wulf C. Krueger wrote: |
3 |
> > Hello Ulrich, |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > On Sa 10 Mai 2014 16:22:33 CEST, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
6 |
> >>>>>>> hasufell wrote: |
7 |
> >>> [...] QA team is [...] |
8 |
> >> All posted to this list in the last two days. Do you really wonder |
9 |
> why |
10 |
> >> you don't get any answers from QA team members any more? |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > It's called "professionalism" - you either pick up a responsibility |
13 |
> and |
14 |
> > deal with even the less... pleasant... people or you don't pick it |
15 |
> up |
16 |
> > in the first place. |
17 |
> > |
18 |
> > In an "office", selectively ignoring those one doesn't like is |
19 |
> > completely inacceptable. And, yes, this is true for any kind of |
20 |
> hobby |
21 |
> > as well. Otherwise, it's better called "amateurism". |
22 |
> > |
23 |
> > -- |
24 |
> > Best regards, Wulf |
25 |
> > |
26 |
> > |
27 |
> |
28 |
> You can't really compare a volunteer project with a paid job or an |
29 |
> office. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> -- |
32 |
> Regards, |
33 |
> Markos Chandras |
34 |
> |
35 |
> |
36 |
> |
37 |
|
38 |
Markos, |
39 |
|
40 |
How far do you think that approach would get the officers and trustees |
41 |
of the Gentoo Foundation Inc. with the American IRS? |
42 |
|
43 |
There is no need to respond anyone. Everyone keep it in mind in your |
44 |
dealings with one anther. Just because there are no contracts of |
45 |
employment nor salaries should not mean that our standards of |
46 |
interaction with one another should not be of a "professional" |
47 |
standard. |
48 |
|
49 |
-- |
50 |
Regards, |
51 |
|
52 |
Roy Bamford |
53 |
(Neddyseagoon) a member of |
54 |
elections |
55 |
gentoo-ops |
56 |
forum-mods |
57 |
trustees |