Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call For Agenda Items - 13 May 2014
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 17:23:01
Message-Id: 1400088178.1644.1@NeddySeagoon_Static
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call For Agenda Items - 13 May 2014 by Markos Chandras
1 On 2014.05.10 15:51, Markos Chandras wrote:
2 > On 05/10/2014 03:30 PM, Wulf C. Krueger wrote:
3 > > Hello Ulrich,
4 > >
5 > > On Sa 10 Mai 2014 16:22:33 CEST, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
6 > >>>>>>> hasufell wrote:
7 > >>> [...] QA team is [...]
8 > >> All posted to this list in the last two days. Do you really wonder
9 > why
10 > >> you don't get any answers from QA team members any more?
11 > >
12 > > It's called "professionalism" - you either pick up a responsibility
13 > and
14 > > deal with even the less... pleasant... people or you don't pick it
15 > up
16 > > in the first place.
17 > >
18 > > In an "office", selectively ignoring those one doesn't like is
19 > > completely inacceptable. And, yes, this is true for any kind of
20 > hobby
21 > > as well. Otherwise, it's better called "amateurism".
22 > >
23 > > --
24 > > Best regards, Wulf
25 > >
26 > >
27 >
28 > You can't really compare a volunteer project with a paid job or an
29 > office.
30 >
31 > --
32 > Regards,
33 > Markos Chandras
34 >
35 >
36 >
37
38 Markos,
39
40 How far do you think that approach would get the officers and trustees
41 of the Gentoo Foundation Inc. with the American IRS?
42
43 There is no need to respond anyone. Everyone keep it in mind in your
44 dealings with one anther. Just because there are no contracts of
45 employment nor salaries should not mean that our standards of
46 interaction with one another should not be of a "professional"
47 standard.
48
49 --
50 Regards,
51
52 Roy Bamford
53 (Neddyseagoon) a member of
54 elections
55 gentoo-ops
56 forum-mods
57 trustees