Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o, Richard Freeman <rich0@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Questions for Candidates (was: Questioning/Interviewing council nominees)
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 22:46:49
Message-Id: CAGfcS_=357p4Wn9mJDbzJTTpzO96PpXjSqkL+X=HwwupnsvLOg@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Questions for Candidates (was: Questioning/Interviewing council nominees) by William Hubbs
1 On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 6:12 PM, William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote:
2 > I am agreeing with you on this. I never said that glep 39 forces you to
3 > do anything.
4
5 No worries. The thread was just going in the direction that GLEP 39
6 was supposed to endorse total chaos. I don't mind some level of
7 creative chaos, but I'm sure that forking ebuilds over the inclusion
8 of a config file is not what those GLEP authors had in mind.
9
10 My reply wasn't directed at you in particular - I just wanted to reply
11 towards the end of the thread and you quoted all the relevant parts.
12
13 Rich