| 1 |
>>>>> On Sat, 14 Jun 2014, Chris Reffett wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> File a bug under Doc Other -> GLEP changes with the exact wording |
| 4 |
> change (discuss on -project if desired) and put it on the Council |
| 5 |
> agenda for approval. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
The metastructure proposal was accepted by a vote of all developers, |
| 8 |
only the result was published in form of an informational GLEP. |
| 9 |
Therefore GLEP 39 is special, and I doubt that the council has any |
| 10 |
power to change it. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Besides, is there really a need for writing this rule down, if it is |
| 13 |
custom and practice since 2006? (Likewise, the process of becoming a |
| 14 |
developer is based on custom and practice, so there is no need for the |
| 15 |
GLEP to define what a "developer" is.) |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Ulrich |
Archives