1 |
Dnia 2014-12-28, o godz. 06:43:47 |
2 |
"Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o> napisał(a): |
3 |
|
4 |
> On 12/27/14 07:34, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
5 |
> > The next council meeting will be in roughly two weeks time on Tuesday |
6 |
> > 2015-01-13, 19:00 UTC in the #gentoo-council channel on Freenode. |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > For proposing agenda items and discussion of these, please reply to this mail |
9 |
> > on the gentoo-project mailing list. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> I'd like to add a discussion on glep 39. In particular, under |
12 |
> specifications we have: |
13 |
> |
14 |
> "It may have one or many leads, and the leads are selected by the |
15 |
> members of the project. This selection must occur at least once every 12 |
16 |
> months, and may occur at any time." |
17 |
> |
18 |
> That requirement and others in the glep assume two things: 1) we have a |
19 |
> team which is not lame and 2) the team has a lead which is not lame. |
20 |
> We've seen cases where both are true. This gives rise to situations |
21 |
> where we are not sure who's on the team, who is in charge of what, etc. |
22 |
> Worse, someone willing to help out doesn't feel he/she has the authority |
23 |
> to make commits, can't get that authority and feels paralyzed or just |
24 |
> acts without cooperation. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> I'd like to discuss this in light of glep 39 and see if we can't |
27 |
> steamline the workflow in these cases. |
28 |
|
29 |
We should also finally decide on a clear way of knowing who's on |
30 |
the team. Right now wiki list seems to be the de-facto solution but |
31 |
many developers simply don't want to get a wiki account... |
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
Best regards, |
35 |
Michał Górny |