Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From:	Denis Dupeyron <calchan@g.o>
To:	gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject:	[gentoo-project] Re: [GLEP 39 overhaul] Should the new text be a GLEP, or something else? How do we update it in the future?
Date:	Fri, 14 May 2010 22:26:28
Message-Id:	`AANLkTik2YqSAZqnHDwNzdi89kQldraoX7eudLMGajPGR@mail.gmail.com`
In Reply to:	[gentoo-project] [GLEP 39 overhaul] Should the new text be a GLEP, or something else? How do we update it in the future? by Denis Dupeyron

1	Summary for this topic, and thus what should be discussed during the
2	council meeting. This time it's a (potentially not exhaustive) list of
3	proposals to vote on. What should be discussed during the meeting is
4	the wording and content of each proposal, and whether each of them
5	make sense at all.
6
7	- The new text should be called GLEP 39, and show what has changed.
8	Any further update to it will require an all developer vote.
9
10	- The new text should be called GLEP 39, and show what has changed.
11	Any further update to it only requires a council vote.
12
13	- The new text should be a new GLEP, GLEP 39 should be marked
14	deprecated. Any further update to it will require an all developer
15	vote.
16
17	- The new text should be a new GLEP, GLEP 39 should be marked
18	deprecated. Any further update to it only requires a council vote.
19
20	- The new text should be split in 2 parts, one being a "constitution"
21	(anybody feel free to propose a better word here) which can only be
22	updated with an all developer vote, another being a simple GLEP which
23	describes the day-to-day rules of operation of the council and can be
24	updated with a council vote.
25
26	Denis.