Archives
Archives
| From: | "Wulf C. Krueger" <wk@×××××××××××.de> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | Ferris McCormick <fmccor@g.o> | ||
| Cc: | gentoo-project <gentoo-project@l.g.o>, rbrown@g.o, Stephen Bennett <spb@g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev] Special meeting [WAS: Council meeting summary for 8 May 2008] | ||
| Date: | Fri, 16 May 2008 13:38:40 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20080516153749.54423cw9y730838k@www2.mailstation.de | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev] Special meeting [WAS: Council meeting summary for 8 May 2008] by Ferris McCormick |
||
| 1 | Hello Ferris, |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > This leaves the subject of the non-meeting unresolved and also the |
| 4 | > pending appeals. Probably we should hold the election quickly and pass |
| 5 | > that on to the next Council, but I think we should hear from those who |
| 6 | > have appeals pending on that. Thus, the CC, assuming email is being |
| 7 | > forwarded correctly. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Personally, I think GLEP39 should be followed and an election should |
| 10 | take place. The suggestions I've read so far, albeit certainly meant |
| 11 | well, all have a "taste", IMHO, and would make (parts of) Gentoo look |
| 12 | bad. |
| 13 | |
| 14 | (I would only hope email keeps getting forwarded until the appeals |
| 15 | have been dealt with.) |
| 16 | |
| 17 | Best regards, Wulf C. Krueger |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev] Special meeting [WAS: Council meeting summary for 8 May 2008] | "William L. Thomson Jr." <wltjr@g.o> |