Archives
Archives
| From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-project@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-project] Maximum number of EAPIs in tree (was: Call For Agenda Items - 10 Jun 2014) | ||
| Date: | Fri, 30 May 2014 01:33:38 | ||
| Message-Id: | 21383.57326.166528.679688@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-project] Maximum number of EAPIs in tree (was: Call For Agenda Items - 10 Jun 2014) by Rich Freeman |
||
| 1 | >>>>> On Thu, 29 May 2014, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 | >> In fact, we could finalise the new EAPI, but devs would only be |
| 5 | >> allowed to commit such ebuilds to the tree when one of the old EAPIs |
| 6 | >> is gone. Nice way to increase peer pressure. :-) |
| 7 | |
| 8 | This was a joke. Please note the smiley. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | > I like the idea of controlling the number of EAPIs in the tree. I |
| 11 | > don't like doing it this way. |