| 1 |
On 28.7.2021 18.03, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
> likely to happen. I suspect that most anonymous contributors don't |
| 3 |
> care THAT much - they're just going to stop contributing. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> I think the key is to find the balance. You can make an argument |
| 6 |
> either way, and I'm not sure how essential these anonymous |
| 7 |
> contributions are. If we're better off without them then just be |
| 8 |
> aware that is the choice we're making... |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
In my eyes we ask our contributors to go around our rules that we can't |
| 12 |
even verify. It's annoying and a joke at the same time. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
And yes I'm aware of quite significant work done by people using |
| 15 |
imaginary names. The overall health and interest of this distribution |
| 16 |
would definitely suffer without those. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- juippis |
Archives