From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-project@l.g.o | ||
Cc: | qa@g.o | ||
Subject: | [gentoo-project] Re: [PATCH] glep-0048: Provide clear rules for disciplinary actions | ||
Date: | Fri, 12 Apr 2019 15:19:57 | ||
Message-Id: | w6g5zrjtfn3.fsf@kph.uni-mainz.de | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-project] [PATCH] glep-0048: Provide clear rules for disciplinary actions by "Michał Górny" |
1 | >>>>> On Fri, 12 Apr 2019, Michał Górny wrote: |
2 | |
3 | > Update the wording of GLEP 48 to provide clear information on what |
4 | > kind of disciplinary actions QA can issue, and in what circumstances |
5 | > they can be exercised. Remove the unclear reference to ComRel that is |
6 | > either meaningless or violation of scope. |
7 | |
8 | Comrel is about disciplinary actions, while QA is about the status of |
9 | the tree. IMHO we should keep that distinction, and not try to transform |
10 | QA into a second Comrel. This has been discussed several times in the |
11 | past, and the outcome always was that QA doesn't need such additional |
12 | superpowers. |
13 | |
14 | Also in my role as deputy QA lead, I find it strange that you post a |
15 | patch to the mailing list, without first discussing your proposal within |
16 | the QA team. |
17 | |
18 | Ulrich |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
[gentoo-project] Re: [PATCH] glep-0048: Provide clear rules for disciplinary actions | Mikle Kolyada <zlogene@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [PATCH] glep-0048: Provide clear rules for disciplinary actions | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [PATCH] glep-0048: Provide clear rules for disciplinary actions | "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o> |