Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Cc: qa@g.o
Subject: [gentoo-project] Re: [PATCH] glep-0048: Provide clear rules for disciplinary actions
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 15:19:57
Message-Id: w6g5zrjtfn3.fsf@kph.uni-mainz.de
In Reply to: [gentoo-project] [PATCH] glep-0048: Provide clear rules for disciplinary actions by "Michał Górny"
1 >>>>> On Fri, 12 Apr 2019, Michał Górny wrote:
2
3 > Update the wording of GLEP 48 to provide clear information on what
4 > kind of disciplinary actions QA can issue, and in what circumstances
5 > they can be exercised. Remove the unclear reference to ComRel that is
6 > either meaningless or violation of scope.
7
8 Comrel is about disciplinary actions, while QA is about the status of
9 the tree. IMHO we should keep that distinction, and not try to transform
10 QA into a second Comrel. This has been discussed several times in the
11 past, and the outcome always was that QA doesn't need such additional
12 superpowers.
13
14 Also in my role as deputy QA lead, I find it strange that you post a
15 patch to the mailing list, without first discussing your proposal within
16 the QA team.
17
18 Ulrich

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies