Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] rfc: separate /usr preparation vote
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 13:35:12
Message-Id: 52121F17.2060109@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] rfc: separate /usr preparation vote by Ulrich Mueller
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA256
3
4 On 19/08/13 02:30 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
5 >>>>>> On Sun, 18 Aug 2013, William Hubbs wrote:
6 >
7 >> Basically the status quo includes specific changes that were made
8 >> in our packaging to allow this sort of working separate /usr
9 >> without initramfs configuration to continue limping along, but we
10 >> need to undo them.
11 >
12 > Let's have a vote in the next meeting if such action is to be
13 > allowed.
14 >
15 > Ulrich
16 >
17
18 I think it might be pertinent to note that the original vote on
19 separate-/usr last year was as much (if not more) about ensuring the
20 current workarounds are not undone as they were about getting new
21 changes approved/accepted.
22 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
23 Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux)
24
25 iF4EAREIAAYFAlISHxcACgkQ2ugaI38ACPAuaQD+LUVR02HglTsa7d04Vgyp1L6R
26 6PlCQI/CKJrfcE2NuVoA/jFOdwOpuvNe+2EpJ/lp6ddV3mDGY1aLa29rspmyYga1
27 =y8iw
28 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----