Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Representation of Gentoo on third-party platforms
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 02:51:30
Message-Id: fba9d5fa-924f-2a6c-5d1f-6533bf7c1fcc@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Representation of Gentoo on third-party platforms by "William L. Thomson Jr."
1 On 11/13/2016 03:40 AM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
2 > On Saturday, November 12, 2016 9:16:09 PM EST Rich Freeman wrote:
3 >>
4 >> Sure. In an ideal world the Council would send out a call for agenda
5 >> items each month, and there wouldn't be any, because everybody is
6 >> resolving their own issues on their own.
7 >
8 > The council should be setting the agenda, leading Gentoo. Call for Agenda
9 > should be minimal and supplemental. Developer input on direction, etc.
10 >
11
12 ...
13
14 > There are many other things the Council and/or Foundation should be doing as
15 > well. Self driven things, not things that are solely coming from developers.
16 >
17
18 Which is the basis, most recently for things like the stable WG as well
19 as the security project GLEP being drafted.
20
21
22 --
23 Kristian Fiskerstrand
24 OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
25 fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature