Re: [gentoo-project] Proposal for Council: Prohibit Harassment & Discrimination via the CoC

[Seemant Kulleen]

Great to see that community guidelines are being curated!

I humbly suggest looking at the Citizen Code of Conduct as a fairly
comprehensive and clearly worded template: http://citizencodeofconduct.org/

Cheers,
Seemant


*--*
*Oakland F'Up (Finish Up!) Weekend* Apr 17-19 Jack London Square
Stuck on a Project?  Procastinating?
Get Unstuck | Mentored | Inspired | Motivated | Finished Up
http://oaklandfup.com <http://seemantk.com>


On 25 April 2015 at 15:08, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote:

> On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@g.o>
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 07:31:01AM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
> >
> >> As a semi-professional environment the stuff in that list doesn't
> >> really belong on our media.  I don't think the wording as it stands
> >> would justify a ban on sci-biology/anatomy-atlas either.  If somebody
> >> can think of a better way to word it so that Gentoo isn't banned at
> >> medical conferences, feel free to propose it.
> > I don't see how my proposal would get us banned at a medical conference,
> > can you clarify?
>
> Sorry, I was referring to the bit about "sexual language and images in
> public spaces."  Would it be against policy for me to demonstrate a
> hypothetical human anatomy application under the Gentoo banner at a
> medical conference?
>
> A bit contrived - I was just musing about Patrick's comment.  Talking
> about sexuality or images that are debate-ably "sexual" in nature can
> be done in a completely professional environment.  In any case I'm
> pretty sure the intent of the policy is not to ban such activities.
>
> It is the whole "I can't define it, but I know it when I see it" business.
>
> In any case, improvements to the wording are welcome, but at some
> point we have to understand the intent and trust those who will
> enforce it accordingly.
>
> --
> Rich
>
>