| 1 |
On 2012.07.23 06:00, Ben de Groot wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 23 July 2012 07:05, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto |
| 3 |
> <jmbsvicetto@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > Hello. |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > The Developer Relations team just held its mandatory yearly |
| 7 |
> election |
| 8 |
> > (per GLEP39). The election resulted in the re-election of Petteri |
| 9 |
> Räty |
| 10 |
> > (betelgeuse) as the DevRel Lead. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Since Council functions also as a "court of appeal" for DevRel, I |
| 13 |
> would |
| 14 |
> like to see us adopt a policy that people cannot be a member of both |
| 15 |
> Council and DevRel. This would avoid any possible conflict of |
| 16 |
> interest. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> What do others think about this? |
| 19 |
> -- |
| 20 |
> Cheers, |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Ben | yngwin |
| 23 |
> Gentoo developer |
| 24 |
> Gentoo Qt project lead, Gentoo Wiki admin |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
I don't see the conflict of interest is great enough so it can't be |
| 30 |
managed. If Petteri is closely involved in a devrel decision that is |
| 31 |
appealed, he can excuse himself playing a part in the council |
| 32 |
consideration of the matter. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
The single point of failure is a bigger issue for me. e.g. Petteri |
| 35 |
is suddenly no longer able to contribute to Gentoo at all. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
Regards, |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
Roy Bamford |
| 41 |
(Neddyseagoon) a member of |
| 42 |
elections |
| 43 |
gentoo-ops |
| 44 |
forum-mods |
| 45 |
trustees |
Archives