| 1 |
El lun, 17-11-2014 a las 11:16 +0100, Manuel Rüger escribió: |
| 2 |
> On 17.11.2014 10:39, Justin (jlec) wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On 16/11/14 18:19, Mikle Kolyada wrote: After all, i noticed, |
| 4 |
> >> not all new developers understand what they must to do ( i have |
| 5 |
> >> an example, but it's another discussion) |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > It is crucial that report such things to us so that we can guide |
| 8 |
> > the mentors more closely. Thanks. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I know the recruiters teams is short on time, but feedback to mentors |
| 12 |
> is really appreciated (at least I do). |
| 13 |
> Maybe you could push a short mail to the mentors after you set up the |
| 14 |
> new dev? |
| 15 |
> This could include the recruiter-reviewed quizzes (so the mentor can |
| 16 |
> diff with the one she or he reviewed. Better prereviews means less |
| 17 |
> work for the recruiters) and a note that the mentor has to check the |
| 18 |
> commits of the new dev in the first month (this should be already |
| 19 |
> known by the mentor, but a subtle hint doesn't harm. Maybe add some |
| 20 |
> best practices for that). |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Cheers |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Manuel |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Have you think on having a mailing list with recruiters and mentors to |
| 28 |
allow all us to ask for doubts, be aware of people willing to be |
| 29 |
recruited or become mentors or similar, help us on different tasks is we |
| 30 |
are able :) ? |
Archives