Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Call For Agenda Items - 10 Jun 2014
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2014 20:05:41
Message-Id: CAGfcS_mhtuyVi2i-5cK5VVPvAUu=1NBpuHNK5=-pjgstX_o6Mg@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Call For Agenda Items - 10 Jun 2014 by Roy Bamford
1 On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o> wrote:
2 > The foundation do not need to be involved any more that they are now.
3 > Anyone can apply for foundation funding for a project.
4 > As an individual trustee, I don't see this project as any different to
5 > any other project that way apply for funding.
6
7 I think the idea is that the policy would be that the Foundation would
8 agree to not fund services that didn't follow the guidelines.
9
10 The rationale would be that if somebody hosts a service funded by the
11 Foundation and it gets used to serve malware then the Foundation might
12 be legally responsible. That is why most organizations don't let
13 random people run its webservers/etc without any kind of adherence to
14 central administration/security/etc. Or perhaps Foundation funds get
15 used to build some service, but because there is no coordination with
16 infra there is no way to ever move it into production and it just
17 fizzles out.
18
19 This wouldn't be about keeping people from running services, but
20 rather encouraging it in a way that makes it safer for the community,
21 gives recognition to those who built it, and gives it some kind of
22 roadmap to being a full-fleged Gentoo service. Maybe it creates a way
23 to on-board new devs into Infra as well.
24
25 I'm talking about services - if somebody wants a sparc under their
26 desk not generally exposed to the world advertising its services under
27 the Gentoo name then there really isn't any need for this.
28
29 I imagine most organizations do it this way. If some Google employee
30 wants to build a development tool or a 10% project hosted on a PC in
31 their cube most likely the policy requirements are minimal, but on the
32 other hand if somebody is touching some server that actually generates
33 content that goes out under the google.com domain then I'm sure the
34 red tape gets fairly thick.
35
36 If we're not going to give any kind of Foundation preference to
37 following the new guidelines, then I don't really see the point in
38 going forward with it.
39
40 Rich