| 1 |
On 29.7.2021 12.53, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> I think that contributions on Github can be counted as a subset of my |
| 4 |
> case e), i.e. they have an independent indication of their license. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> This is by section D.6 of Github's terms of service [1]: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> | Whenever you add Content to a repository containing notice of a |
| 9 |
> | license, you license that Content under the same terms, and you agree |
| 10 |
> | that you have the right to license that Content under those terms. If |
| 11 |
> | you have a separate agreement to license that Content under different |
| 12 |
> | terms, such as a contributor license agreement, that agreement will |
| 13 |
> | supersede. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Works for me, your examples from a. to f. looks good, but how do you |
| 17 |
suggest the GLEP is to be updated so these become clear for everyone? |
| 18 |
Talking about contributors, and final contribution committers (devs). I |
| 19 |
could imagine a simple "examples" paragraph with your suggestion written |
| 20 |
in it word-to-word. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- juippis |
Archives