Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2018-07-29
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2018 20:50:41
Message-Id: 1531601431.1025.13.camel@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2018-07-29 by Matthew Thode
1 W dniu sob, 14.07.2018 o godzinie 14∶29 -0500, użytkownik Matthew Thode
2 napisał:
3 > On 18-07-14 21:10:11, Michał Górny wrote:
4 > > W dniu sob, 14.07.2018 o godzinie 18∶21 +0200, użytkownik Manuel Rüger
5 > > napisał:
6 > > > On 13.07.2018 10:37, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
7 > > > > In two weeks from now, the newly elected council will have its first
8 > > > > meeting. This is the time to raise and prepare items that the council
9 > > > > should put on the agenda to discuss or vote on.
10 > > > >
11 > > > > Please respond to this message with agenda items. Do not hesitate
12 > > > > to repeat your agenda item here with a pointer if you previously
13 > > > > suggested one (since the last meeting).
14 > > > >
15 > > > > The agenda for the meeting will be sent out on Sunday 2018-07-22.
16 > > > >
17 > > > > Please reply to the gentoo-project list.
18 > > > >
19 > > > > Ulrich
20 > > > >
21 > > >
22 > > > As the council represents the Gentoo Developer community, the council
23 > > > members should behave as role models for this community.
24 > > >
25 > > > I would like each council member to explicitly state their agreement to
26 > > > our Code of Conduct.
27 > > > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Council/Code_of_conduct
28 > >
29 > > The request for the new Council members to reiterate their
30 > > acknowledgement of Code of Conduct -- which they obviously implicitly
31 > > agreed to -- sounds like a serious implicit accusation. Isn't making
32 > > such an accusation a violation of Code of Conduct itself though?
33 > >
34 >
35 > I don't think of it as an accusation, more of a 'swearing in' as they
36 > are moving into a new office.
37 >
38
39 Having more context to this than you do, I think it's an elaborate
40 scheme of petty vengeance. Thus, it's doubly offensive since Council is
41 being used here as a tool to developer's private vendetta.
42
43 --
44 Best regards,
45 Michał Górny

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies