| 1 |
On Sat, 2019-04-27 at 03:04 +0200, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: |
| 2 |
> Michał Górny schrieb: |
| 3 |
> > > > If you follow that logic, we end up with ComRel deciding to punish |
| 4 |
> > > > people based on the private opinions of its members rather than |
| 5 |
> > > > established rules. |
| 6 |
> > > |
| 7 |
> > > what logic? |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > The logic that ComRel apparently doesn't create rules. Ergo, ComRel |
| 10 |
> > punishes without rules. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> I don't think so. ComRel does not create the rules. While they do have |
| 13 |
> internally established procedures how to deal with things, the important |
| 14 |
> rules by which they operate are imposed from outside. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
It all depends on where you set the line between 'rules imposed from |
| 18 |
outside' and 'rules (procedures) internally established'. QA doesn't go |
| 19 |
out of their way to introduce abstract rules either, it mostly builds |
| 20 |
more precise rules from generic directives 'imposed from outside'. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Best regards, |
| 24 |
Michał Górny |
Archives