| 1 |
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 1:24 AM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> W dniu pią, 09.02.2018 o godzinie 00∶48 -0700, użytkownik Daniel Robbins |
| 4 |
> napisał: |
| 5 |
> > Ulm, |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > You are using hyperbole. A majority vote of trustees is required. That is |
| 8 |
> > not haphazard, as you state -- it is a process that requires majority |
| 9 |
> > consensus of elected officials. We assume that the trustees are looking |
| 10 |
> out |
| 11 |
> > for the project. The trustees are there to protect the community so they |
| 12 |
> > must have this ability. |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> You seem to have a very idealistic assumption of who Trustees are |
| 16 |
> and how they are 'elected'. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
I really am not in a position to 'judge' the trustees. I do know that they |
| 20 |
are elected. So if a trustee does a bad job, they can be voted out by the |
| 21 |
members. This is the responsibility of the members -- to do research and |
| 22 |
use their vote wisely. I also know that being a trustee is often a |
| 23 |
thankless job and involves lots of necessary work that often isn't very fun |
| 24 |
to do. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Best, |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Daniel |
Archives