1 |
On 12/05/11 00:26, Markos Chandras wrote: |
2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
3 |
> Hash: SHA512 |
4 |
> |
5 |
> On 12/04/2011 03:42 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote: |
6 |
>> Fabian Groffen schrieb: |
7 |
>>> Ok, you mean the --quiet-build=y default that most recent Portage |
8 |
>>> uses, right? Also known to some as the parallel build output. |
9 |
>> Yes |
10 |
> I agree that the decision was made too fast but reverting seems like a |
11 |
> joke to me. People will think that we are making fun of them by |
12 |
> changing the defaults all the time. Imho it is too late to go back. |
13 |
|
14 |
Great, so if I just patch stuff I can also claim that now it's too late |
15 |
to revert? |
16 |
That's a nice non-sequitur :) |
17 |
> |
18 |
>> If this does not get reverted and if it gets accepted to be the |
19 |
>> default, i would request a news item, when it goes into a stable |
20 |
>> version of portage, since a good amount of people wondered, why the |
21 |
>> portage output changed (default for --quiet-build was changed), why |
22 |
>> it was done and how they could change that behaviour. |
23 |
>> |
24 |
> I certainly agree with that. People keep wondering why portage is so |
25 |
> quiet. |
26 |
And spend much more time trying to find them silly logfiles now that we |
27 |
hide the output. I really enjoy having to fix yet another bad default |
28 |
everywhere just so I see *why* things fail ... |
29 |
|
30 |
> |
31 |
> In any case I believe the council should discuss these problems in the |
32 |
> upcoming meeting |
33 |
> |
34 |
Ack. |