| 1 |
On 13/11/16 01:54, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 11/13/2016 02:53 AM, M. J. Everitt wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>>>> With respect, Kristian, I really don't believe we have a problem with |
| 5 |
>>>> technical matters ... ;] |
| 6 |
>>>> |
| 7 |
>>> The description above is a normative description of how things works in |
| 8 |
>>> the general case, which doesn't involve comrel. The latter is only |
| 9 |
>>> involved when the usual dispute resolution is not applicable due to |
| 10 |
>>> personnel making technical issues personal. |
| 11 |
>>> |
| 12 |
>> Ok so for the sake of clarity, we have a purely technical issue, which |
| 13 |
>> is either right or wrong .. and then someone takes it as a personal |
| 14 |
>> affront, instead of being mature and professional, and accepting the |
| 15 |
>> correction, learning the lesson, to put into practise in future. So |
| 16 |
>> instead of the issue being purely technical .. said person MAKES it |
| 17 |
>> personal .. and therefore themselves causes a conflict .. which requires |
| 18 |
>> some form of Discipline .. which breeds hate .. and ... |
| 19 |
>> |
| 20 |
>> .. you see where I'm going .. ?! |
| 21 |
>> |
| 22 |
> At which point ComRel is the applicable body |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
And this is where I think we are all going wrong ........ it should |
| 25 |
indeed never *ever* reach that point. Are we not all agreed on that |
| 26 |
point maybe??? |
Archives