| 1 |
On 10/9/15 6:58 AM, hasufell wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 10/09/2015 12:50 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Once that happens, we have important history on infrastructure |
| 4 |
>> outside of our control. |
| 5 |
> That implies IRC. And important discussions DO happen there. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I have logs where I tried to get devs to discuss an issue on a bug |
| 8 |
rather than IRC so others could see it. They resisted. So to some |
| 9 |
degree yes. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> The history however is saved. The same goes for github (saved via github |
| 13 |
> mail notifications). |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Actually that may be the way around this. If we could archive those and |
| 16 |
have them searchable that would address my concern and I would change my |
| 17 |
position. This seems doable. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> However, once something needs to be discussed community wide, we |
| 22 |
> _always_ take that discussion to the public MLs, possibly copying the |
| 23 |
> relevant history. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> This does not change in any way with github. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> Are you suggesting that we move away from IRC now, because not all |
| 29 |
> important discussions start on our mailing lists? |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. |
| 35 |
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] |
| 36 |
E-Mail : blueness@g.o |
| 37 |
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA |
| 38 |
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA |
Archives