| 1 |
Dean Stephens: |
| 2 |
> On 02/15/15 22:26, hasufell wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Scripts no one can read except the team (even after being asked to |
| 4 |
>> publish them) is by definition propriety software. It was used to |
| 5 |
>> develop and package emul-linux-x86-* packages until this very day. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
> Your prose might benefit from labeling when you are using hyperbole, |
| 8 |
> otherwise when you make factually inaccurate claims it might seem as |
| 9 |
> though you actually believe them. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> In case that was unclear: while those scripts might not be formally |
| 12 |
> published, they have been made available to people who are not on the |
| 13 |
> team. Unless, that is, you define "the team" as anyone who has seen the |
| 14 |
> scripts; in which case you would be trivially correct by definition. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Are you saying you only share the code with your buddies? In that case, |
| 18 |
it is against our social contract as well. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Not only that, it is even a serious security problem since the developer |
| 21 |
community doesn't know how these things are packaged and neither do the |
| 22 |
users. |
Archives