Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
To: gentoo-project <gentoo-project@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] council meeting agenda, mar 12
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 13:33:38
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] council meeting agenda, mar 12 by Daniel Campbell
On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 1:39 AM, Daniel Campbell <zlg@g.o> wrote:
> > If there's already an easy way to find council decisions like this, pardon > my ignorance.
Council decisions are generally made in meetings, and posted in the summaries at: For whatever reason this decision was pushed a bit and is in a bug: Speaking personally I didn't mind voting this way since it was mostly just a re-iteration of the previous decision, and it had been hashed out on the lists. I believe it is on the agenda for today mainly to get it into the summary so that it isn't lost in bugzilla. I don't really expect much further discussion. The decision was: The council confirms its earlier decision (2014-10-14 meeting) to drop CVS headers after migration to Git. 1) Any $Id$ and $Header$ lines are to be removed from ebuilds and eclasses in the gentoo repository, as well as from other files, e.g., metadata, profiles, and files (except patches) in FILESDIR. 2) Removal should be done at once, and a repoman check should be implemented to prevent such lines from accidentally being inserted again. 3) Infra is asked not to expand any $Id$ or other keywords, neither at rsync generation time, nor via git attributes in the development repository." -- Rich


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] council meeting agenda, mar 12 Daniel Campbell <zlg@g.o>