Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
To: gentoo-project <gentoo-project@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] council meeting agenda, mar 12
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 13:33:38
Message-Id: CAGfcS_kKX+Tw05ecxi_z7jdTZmeb0Pra1_7YWz1esuADpk5=Yg@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] council meeting agenda, mar 12 by Daniel Campbell
1 On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 1:39 AM, Daniel Campbell <zlg@g.o> wrote:
2 >
3 > If there's already an easy way to find council decisions like this, pardon
4 > my ignorance.
5
6 Council decisions are generally made in meetings, and posted in the
7 summaries at:
8 https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Council/Meeting_logs
9
10 For whatever reason this decision was pushed a bit and is in a bug:
11 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=611234
12
13 Speaking personally I didn't mind voting this way since it was mostly
14 just a re-iteration of the previous decision, and it had been hashed
15 out on the lists.
16
17 I believe it is on the agenda for today mainly to get it into the
18 summary so that it isn't lost in bugzilla. I don't really expect much
19 further discussion.
20
21 The decision was:
22
23 The council confirms its earlier decision (2014-10-14 meeting) to drop
24 CVS headers after migration to Git.
25
26 1) Any $Id$ and $Header$ lines are to be removed from ebuilds and
27 eclasses in the gentoo repository, as well as from other files, e.g.,
28 metadata, profiles, and files (except patches) in FILESDIR.
29
30 2) Removal should be done at once, and a repoman check should be
31 implemented to prevent such lines from accidentally being inserted
32 again.
33
34 3) Infra is asked not to expand any $Id$ or other keywords, neither at
35 rsync generation time, nor via git attributes in the development
36 repository."
37
38 --
39 Rich

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] council meeting agenda, mar 12 Daniel Campbell <zlg@g.o>