Archives
Archives
| From: | "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-project@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2011-11-08 | ||
| Date: | Mon, 31 Oct 2011 09:52:51 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4EAE6FD8.5030203@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2011-11-08 by Fabian Groffen |
||
| 1 | On 26.10.2011 19.30, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | > Please respond to this email with agenda items. Please do not hestitate |
| 5 | > to repeat your agenda item here with a pointer if you previously |
| 6 | > suggested one (since the last meeting). |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Let's vote on if you are allowed to remove functions from eclasses (or |
| 11 | break the API in general): |
| 12 | |
| 13 | http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_f797a983b0d11677a1f781e48ab4e97d.xml |
| 14 | |
| 15 | Last time this came up a decision wasn't reached: |
| 16 | http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20100726-summary.txt |
| 17 | |
| 18 | The decision should then be documented here: |
| 19 | http://devmanual.gentoo.org/eclass-writing/index.html |
| 20 | |
| 21 | Regards, |
| 22 | Petteri |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2011-11-08 | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> |