1 |
Denis Dupeyron wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Jan Bilek <clonolu@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
>> But some |
4 |
>> people claim it is because of a lack of manpower in Gentoo - in that |
5 |
>> case we might want to re-think recruitment process. |
6 |
|
7 |
> One. There is no waiting list for recruitment. You could be in |
8 |
> recruitment today if you wanted. Notice that, if *you* wanted. If |
9 |
> people spent as much time contributing as they spend thinking they're |
10 |
> thinking, circling around the obvious and regurgitating randomness, |
11 |
> we'd be one damn active project. And don't tell me you don't have time |
12 |
> or don't have the competence. None of us have time but we make it, |
13 |
> plus you spent some writing this rather long email and others. And we |
14 |
> don't only need technical people. I'd even say today we mostly need |
15 |
> non-technical people. The staff quiz takes only a few minutes. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Two. You don't need to be a dev to contribute. Actually, being a dev |
18 |
> means contributing like any user plus having the responsibility of |
19 |
> dealing with the everyday mess (to say it mildly). I can tell you it's |
20 |
> not fun everyday, so you may want to stay a contributing user. Having |
21 |
> cvs commit rights will not make your penis any larger, but could |
22 |
> result in your significant other walking away without you even seeing |
23 |
> it. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> Three. You're on the nfp list. If you really want to improve |
26 |
> recruitment, you want to talk to devrel's recruitment subproject. |
27 |
|
28 |
That is what needs to be told to the community, not just one person. I'm |
29 |
pretty sure that if more people knew that then there would be a large |
30 |
influx of people. |
31 |
|
32 |
Has Gentoo never done a recruitment drive? I'm sure I could help and/or |
33 |
fix it all up to start within a week for you... |
34 |
-- |
35 |
gentoo-project@l.g.o mailing list |