1 |
On 07/12/2017 09:47 AM, William Hubbs wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, Jul 09, 2017 at 06:56:25PM +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: |
3 |
>> Dear all, |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>> The new Gentoo Council will meet on Sunday, July 16th at 19:00 UTC |
6 |
>> in #gentoo-council on FreeNode. |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> Please reply to this message with any items you would like us to discuss |
9 |
>> or vote on. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Based on the on-going discussion about stabilization policies, I would |
12 |
> like to ask the council to consider moving glep 40 to withdrawn status. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Thanks, |
15 |
> |
16 |
> William |
17 |
> |
18 |
|
19 |
I feel like the best approach would be: |
20 |
|
21 |
1) amend GLEP 40 to be about all arches |
22 |
2) have amd64 and x86 arch teams publish on their project wiki pages |
23 |
that their official stance wrt the "individual arrangements" portion of |
24 |
GLEP 40 is that they are open to all developers running and testing on a |
25 |
stable installation of that arch to stabilize their own packages |
26 |
3) work on replacing GLEP 40 with something better |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
NP-Hardass |