Archives
Archives
| From: | "Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn" <chithanh@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-project@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-project] changing the default of ACCEPT_LICENSE in portage | ||
| Date: | Thu, 25 Jul 2013 21:12:08 | ||
| Message-Id: | 51F194A0.9000009@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-project] changing the default of ACCEPT_LICENSE in portage by Ulrich Mueller |
||
| 1 | Ulrich Mueller schrieb: |
| 2 | > I suggest that we add exactly one "no-source-code" pseudo license. |
| 3 | > So binary-only BSD, MIT, etc. packages would be marked "BSD |
| 4 | > no-source-code" or "MIT no-source-code". Since the "no-source-code" |
| 5 | > license wouldn't be a member of the @FREE license group, installation |
| 6 | > of such packages would be prevented with ACCEPT_LICENSE="@FREE". |
| 7 | |
| 8 | And no-source-code means that no public free licensed source code exists at |
| 9 | all, or is just not shipped in the distfile? Do we need to distinguish these |
| 10 | two? (I think this affects various -bin packages and fonts mostly) |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Best regards, |
| 14 | Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-project] changing the default of ACCEPT_LICENSE in portage | Alexander Berntsen <alexander@××××××.net> |
| Re: [gentoo-project] changing the default of ACCEPT_LICENSE in portage | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-project] changing the default of ACCEPT_LICENSE in portage | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> |