Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" <jmbsvicetto@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo Council Elections Results for term 2014-2015
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 00:59:28
Message-Id: alpine.LNX.2.00.1407180048310.14601@woodpecker.gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo Council Elections Results for term 2014-2015 by "Manuel RĂ¼ger"
1 On Thu, 17 Jul 2014, Manuel R?ger wrote:
2
3 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
4 > Hash: SHA512
5 >
6 > On 07/17/2014 03:16 PM, hasufell wrote:
7 >> Why is there any mapping between id and developer name (or why have
8 >> the election officials access to this mapping... by definition it's
9 >> already a non-anonymous election then)?
10 >>
11 >
12 > That's a valid point. Can an election official reply to it, please?
13
14 The election officials get the master ballot and the confirmatiion ids
15 file, so they can send each voter their confirmation id - that is an
16 important part of the election as that's what allows each voter to confirm
17 their ballot wasn't "tampered". This is how I was able to send the
18 confirmation emails to all voters.
19 Why do election officials get that mapping? Because the current election
20 software doesn't have any automatic method to take care of this and relies
21 in the election officials. This does mean that officials have access to
22 the ballots - and as others already mentioned, any infra team member has
23 access to the dirs in pecker.
24 Given the above, why are we using this election software? Because that's
25 what we've been using forever - at least this is what I was handed back in
26 2008 and believe goes back to azarah. I've looked in the past at
27 alternatives, exactly due to some of these concerns as well as other
28 technical issues that affect the software.
29 I've contacted the debian developer responsible by devotee[1] a few times
30 in the past, but didn't move forward as he had some plans to update it as
31 at the time it was too tied to debian's infra and I end up losing track of
32 this.
33
34 [1] - https://www.debian.org/vote/
35
36 > This is not meant in an offensive way, I'd just like to understand the
37 > workflow of the election.
38
39 No offense taken.
40
41 > Cheers,
42 >
43 > Manuel
44 >
45 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
46 > Version: GnuPG v2.0
47 > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
48 >
49 > iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJTyASAXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
50 > ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ4MDA1RERERkM0ODM2QkE4MEY3NzY0N0M1
51 > OEZCQTM2QzhEOUQ2MzVDAAoJEFj7o2yNnWNcF9sP+gNOqLRfilDdgM+QZFdmciWp
52 > 1vbCNTE56KSNxufQdlxKQgACVf8KacmQYMv0mxZ3eEVbLkH1D/Vg3aZ0ZuAXODg9
53 > TBPCi/hMzDmy0Z33FhcUh3F56xW/yBxzWX2e17/OuctimwVqOYSxzsUO9DfaFT96
54 > tC91+jcMsIkYYoUwii9Q9TixfwJeCTMi/h0hrRUjlZKGM3qW2sQPokZDrBiSSL7+
55 > 1W3NbNc6gZ7bDTtW14xNY7srpV7yaYQrY7N4tYJwkBSDfXBOtxQGNxADSWMI3l2v
56 > 0741RezxZnfXMc7QzPGfpfyemxFFP5bvc2UO5W9heXewfHKGl7Sn/BhNeLC7UE53
57 > ZwuQFPRm8ad7VTaWSzkvkCDMYrqvgWKH2nCaOBel09XqvSHMFvVKKq/RBJitmoAT
58 > Vc70fGrB64MIp+bWsLTMUnaoggzp/xsuTF/2fj3dsl+ch/ODK6XbfDfT9bHfvsBL
59 > g5btpeRFwmxxrnqfNZGBw0Q0ZQQpxQuPGEclFaGWCdzC450wLlPhDlJgaKsK8cEY
60 > /UYAha0HeLkE8kay3rrsi7csSRtJKMNxND0trmEIGZKITS3lPyV+/6oWmmbfEU2E
61 > ytaGsNlVQn18aiZHAGNbPydr+0xo2rHD+J4R/rcCtYJcJKaehRim9cX+sETMS27s
62 > 9pUl5AZCq0GlG37Je1jW
63 > =4fty
64 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
65 >
66 >