1 |
Dnia 2013-06-16, o godz. 12:21:54 |
2 |
Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o> napisał(a): |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 05:33:22 -0400 |
5 |
> "Walter Dnes" <waltdnes@××××××××.org> wrote: |
6 |
> |
7 |
> > I think the best way to avoid maintainer conflicts is to take this |
8 |
> > out of the hands of maintainers, |
9 |
> |
10 |
> +1 I was planning to write a GLEP for a concept where optional files |
11 |
> would be maintained separately from packages, this could then be |
12 |
> covered in later revisions of the PMS so that in a reasonable time from |
13 |
> now we can properly support this and end to the rage and rage quits. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> But you were before me, so I might as well elaborate with thoughts so |
16 |
> we can all end up improving the idea about how this ends up being. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> [...] |
19 |
|
20 |
No offense but I feel like you're wasting your time, and that would |
21 |
result in wasting more time of others as well. |
22 |
|
23 |
We're talking about tiny files which are usually installed by one- or |
24 |
two-liner. And any solution that has been brought so far has either |
25 |
severe issues or is simply overcomplex. |
26 |
|
27 |
Seriously, you're talking about replacing 'dofoo ${FILESDIR}/bar' with |
28 |
two pages of text. This whole thread is taking much more effort than |
29 |
the actual issue, please just stop at this point. |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
Best regards, |
33 |
Michał Górny |