| 1 |
On Thu, 05 Jun 2014 12:06:35 -0400 |
| 2 |
Richard Yao <ryao@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 05/29/2014 03:03 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Am Montag, 26. Mai 2014, 14:13:32 schrieb Rich Freeman: |
| 6 |
> >> The next Gentoo Council meeting will be on 10 Jun 2014, at 19:00 |
| 7 |
> >> UTC. |
| 8 |
> >> |
| 9 |
> >> Please reply to this email with any proposed agenda items. |
| 10 |
> >> |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > Let's decide that the maximum number of EAPIs allowed in the |
| 13 |
> > portage tree at any time must not exceed 7. |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > 7, since then EAPI=6 can still go ahead as planned. |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> > Any new plans afterwards can only proceed if EAPI=1 is finally gone |
| 18 |
> > (achievable), and for more improvements the bar gets a bit higher |
| 19 |
> > afterwards. |
| 20 |
> > |
| 21 |
> > Thanks to Johu for the inspiration. |
| 22 |
> > |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> I think we should define a minimum amount of time before new EAPIs may |
| 25 |
> be introduced to the portage tree. 2 years seems reasonable. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
That likely won't work. Plus I believe it is already set at a minimum |
| 29 |
of 1 year, with the possibility for exceptions to be approved by |
| 30 |
council. But if the ideas and patches to implement them are not done, |
| 31 |
it could be many years before final approval. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
Brian Dolbec <dolsen> |
Archives