| 1 |
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 05:36:30PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 2020-02-17 at 10:18 -0600, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Since comrel is a special TLP like QA, I think the comrel lead, like |
| 4 |
> > the qa lead, should be confirmed by the council. |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> You may also want to have a GLEP for ComRel like GLEP 48 is for QA. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
This is a good idea; I will write one. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
... |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> > To promote more transparency with comrel, I would like to |
| 14 |
> > require the comrel lead to send a report to the gentoo-project list monthly |
| 15 |
> > containing these statistics for the previous month: |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> > - number of bugs received |
| 18 |
> > - number of bugs pending (this is for bugs that are currently in process) |
| 19 |
> > - number of bugs resolved by actions (such as talking to |
| 20 |
> > developers or disciplinary action) |
| 21 |
> > - number of bugs closed without action |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Not sure if you wouldn't need more split, e.g. between requests rejected |
| 24 |
> as invalid, withdrawn or timed out. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
There's not a timed out or invalid status for comrel that I'm aware of, |
| 27 |
but withdrawn might be good. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
I will encorporate that into the glep also. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
William |
Archives