| 1 |
El vie, 05-10-2012 a las 08:28 +0200, Fabian Groffen escribió: |
| 2 |
> On 04-10-2012 20:32:41 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
| 3 |
> > > And what about current usage in the tree with current eapis? Regarding |
| 4 |
> > > IUSE_FLATTENED I have no problem with it, but will need to talk with |
| 5 |
> > > portage team also as they have the current implementation |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > And then, I think council should clarify what to do with current usages |
| 8 |
> > in the tree with eapi0-4 |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Why should the Council clarify that? |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Who should be then? This has been already talked in gentoo-dev and we |
| 14 |
still don't know what to do with current ebuild/eclasses already relying |
| 15 |
on them, and reverting them to some other solution would later need us |
| 16 |
to re-migrate them to current one when it's specified in next EAPI. This |
| 17 |
is all explained in original message I send, the problem is that there |
| 18 |
is a total lack of knowledge about how to proceed and what to do and, |
| 19 |
then, I think that Council should decide it. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> (Not that we're unwilling, but I don't see why Council should be the |
| 22 |
> initiator here.) |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> |
Archives