| 1 |
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Richard Yao <ryao@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> I understand that the council is scheduled to vote on a topic related to |
| 3 |
> udev stabilization. Would it be possible to delay the vote for another |
| 4 |
> month so that we have time to get organized? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Seems counterproductive. Most likely a reasonably long period of time |
| 7 |
would be set aside before a new udev is stabilized. If an alternative |
| 8 |
emerges in the meantime, then those who want to use it can do so, and |
| 9 |
be spared the need to use initramfs for separate /usr, or whatever. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Gentoo is about choice, and as long as a dev is willing to maintain a |
| 12 |
fork there is no reason not to support it. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
However, the udev team has been on hold for quite a while over this |
| 15 |
issue already. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
That said, competition is good for everybody. Best of luck with it! |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Just my own two cents... |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Rich |
Archives