From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-project@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2012-06-12 | ||
Date: | Sun, 03 Jun 2012 15:02:59 | ||
Message-Id: | 20120603133832.4c5cf6cf@googlemail.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2012-06-12 by Samuli Suominen |
1 | On Sun, 03 Jun 2012 12:42:45 +0300 |
2 | Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
3 | > When all there is required is dropping some "$@" to the Portage code |
4 | > and be done with it, and have everything be in consistent format... |
5 | |
6 | The question is not about the code, but about the design. Your design |
7 | doesn't make sense: there's no direct correspondence between functions |
8 | and phases, so it's not obvious where arguments to "default" get sent. |
9 | |
10 | "default" is for the easy cases. If you're wanting to do something |
11 | different, don't use it. |
12 | |
13 | -- |
14 | Ciaran McCreesh |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2012-06-12 | William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> |