| 1 |
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 7:22 AM, Tomáš Chvátal <scarabeus@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> We should not have any darn rule just to please one project, the best |
| 3 |
> council should do is to say that systemd in main tree is fine (which it |
| 4 |
> already had) and that maitnainers can offload the maintenance burden for the |
| 5 |
> file to systemd team if they don't want to care about it. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Then could the council at least say that? Right now they basically |
| 8 |
said that if the maintainer doesn't want the file they can remove it, |
| 9 |
unless the systemd team signs up as co-maintainers on any package with |
| 10 |
hostile maintainers. They did NOT say that the maintainers should |
| 11 |
accept these files and offload the maintenance burden for the file |
| 12 |
(something which the systemd team indicated on-list is acceptable to |
| 13 |
them). |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Rich |
Archives