1 |
W dniu wto, 27.03.2018 o godzinie 17∶11 -0500, użytkownik Matthias Maier |
2 |
napisał: |
3 |
> The next council meeting is in about two weeks. This is the time to |
4 |
> raise and prepare items that the council should put on the agenda to |
5 |
> discuss or vote on. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Please respond to this message with agenda items. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Please repeat your agenda item here with a pointer if you previously |
10 |
> suggested one (since the last meeting)! |
11 |
> |
12 |
> The agenda for the meeting will be sent out on Sunday 2018-04-01. |
13 |
> |
14 |
|
15 |
If we manage to find the time after solving the important cat problem, |
16 |
I'd like the Council to vote on final EAPI 7 version. This would be all |
17 |
items originally pre-approved, excluding the following: |
18 |
|
19 |
a. Sandbox path removal functions rm* [1] as requested by ulm. We've |
20 |
established that those aren't strictly needed at the moment and we'd |
21 |
like to come up with a better design (possibly a single function instead |
22 |
of 4 we have now, or 8+ we'd have with the proposal). |
23 |
|
24 |
b. Runtime-switchable USE flags [2] due to not being implemented. |
25 |
|
26 |
c. ||= binding any-of deps [3] due to not being implemented (and not |
27 |
even being clear on how it could be implemented). |
28 |
|
29 |
The EAPI 7 draft is available at [4]. Note that it needs to be updated |
30 |
for the removed items. |
31 |
|
32 |
All other items were implemented and tested in Portage. The only item |
33 |
not merged yet is SYSROOT/BROOT whose implementation is still being |
34 |
nitpicked a bit but there's no risk that it wouldn't be finished soon. |
35 |
|
36 |
While at it, I would also like to establish a timeline for permitting |
37 |
tree-wide use of EAPI 7. |
38 |
|
39 |
[1]:https://bugs.gentoo.org/630422 |
40 |
[2]:https://bugs.gentoo.org/424283 |
41 |
[3]:https://bugs.gentoo.org/489458 |
42 |
[4]:https://dev.gentoo.org/~ulm/pms/7-draft/pms.html |
43 |
|
44 |
-- |
45 |
Best regards, |
46 |
Michał Górny |