Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: "Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn" <chithanh@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2011-12-13
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 23:04:30
Message-Id: 4EDD4DF3.60307@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2011-12-13 by "Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn"
1 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn schrieb:
2 > Mike Frysinger schrieb:
3 >> what would be more likely is they try to run
4 >> `cdrecord`, find it missing, find the build failed, and then file a bug. that
5 >> workflow really isn't affected by the defaults here.
6 >> -mike
7 >
8 > In versions prior to cdrecord-3.00 it was actually the case that nothing
9 > at all was installed. That would cause patrick to notice and scroll back
10 > up in his terminal buffer now to see wtf went wrong.
11 >
12 > Since 3.00 it installs a cdrecord binary that runs but doesn't actually
13 > talk to hardware. Fun.
14
15 Oh nevermind, I noticed it doesn't install cdrecord after all, and
16 prefix uses system-installed one.
17
18
19 Best regards,
20 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn