| 1 |
Hi Mikle, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
first of all, no need to defend. I think it's very good to have |
| 4 |
diversity. And it's perfectly fine if one candidate wants to be more |
| 5 |
active (in which case I would like to ask him or her why he or she |
| 6 |
wasn't active before like you don't have to be member of the council to |
| 7 |
bring yourself into Gentoo and mgorny is a perfect *positive* example |
| 8 |
how you would do that) and another believe he/she should be more passive. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> Most of the ideas / decisions that affect the *daily* developers life is |
| 12 |
> sourced from comrel or qa teams after community collaboration. |
| 13 |
> Surely, council is still voting for things like gleps or the general |
| 14 |
> tree licensing, |
| 15 |
> but I do not see the most of them involved in the creation or changes |
| 16 |
> process. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
That's a good example I think. *I* don't believe that council members |
| 19 |
have to actually write GLEPs just because they are part of the council. |
| 20 |
If you have an idea I think it's normal that you will start working on |
| 21 |
this and start writing the proposal. Sure, you will probably allow |
| 22 |
others to join and help you. But expecting that you just post the idea |
| 23 |
to the mailing list and that others, especially the council, should pick |
| 24 |
this up and discuss *your* idea *for* you and do all the rest is not the |
| 25 |
way I see council's role. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Regards, |
| 30 |
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 31 |
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 |
Archives