1 |
On 2020-12-13 08:28, desultory wrote: |
2 |
> On 12/12/20 10:34, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: |
3 |
>> So in this case, Matt, who is also in council, brought up the code of |
4 |
>> conduct violations. Sure we can talk about the tone. But did anything |
5 |
>> happen? Did we break any rules? Did we treat his request preferentially |
6 |
>> in any way? |
7 |
>> |
8 |
> Either those were all rhetorical questions or I have been giving you far |
9 |
> too much credit. In short, yes, to all of them. |
10 |
|
11 |
Seriously, please outline in detail what you believe is wrong and also |
12 |
explain. I don't understand why you and neddyseagoon are keeping |
13 |
repeating this but I *really* would like to get your point. |
14 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
> I already offered alternative motions, none were included in the meeting |
17 |
> agenda. |
18 |
|
19 |
Like dilfridge asked you, please take your time and post this again. I |
20 |
am also failing to find anything like that. |
21 |
|
22 |
|
23 |
Finally please also allow me to ask why 30+ days after all of this |
24 |
started, nobody from forums team took yet any action, i.e. the post I |
25 |
showed on Friday is still untouched. Have I missed an issued |
26 |
warning/ban? Did forums team reviewed the posting after it was brought |
27 |
to your attention through the mailing list (yes, not your favored |
28 |
channel but I hope nobody is saying 'we ignored it because you didn't |
29 |
use the correct channel to report') and decided that no further action |
30 |
is required? |
31 |
|
32 |
I must admit that at this point I am really lacking a signal from forums |
33 |
team that they at least understand and acknowledge that there is a |
34 |
problem. Doesn't matter if we agree on the solution yet but at least a |
35 |
*clear* signal that the message was received and we are all one the same |
36 |
page would be appreciated. |
37 |
|
38 |
|
39 |
-- |
40 |
Regards, |
41 |
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer |
42 |
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 |