1 |
On 06/27/2018 10:25 AM, Michał Górny wrote: |
2 |
> (CC-ing the remaining people to remind them to be subscribed to -project |
3 |
> and read archives) |
4 |
> |
5 |
> W dniu wto, 26.06.2018 o godzinie 09∶11 +0200, użytkownik Michał Górny |
6 |
> napisał: |
7 |
>> To improve readability of the thread, I'll ask my question in reply to |
8 |
>> myself ;-). |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Three more questions from me: |
11 |
> |
12 |
> |
13 |
> 1. Do you believe that Council members should respect the requests of |
14 |
> the developer community even if they disagree with them? Or should |
15 |
> Council members decide based on their own judgment of arguments |
16 |
> presented? |
17 |
|
18 |
Respect and agree are two different things. As with any board position, |
19 |
once elected the duty of the individual is to what is perceived as the |
20 |
best of the organization, despite any short term noise. One issue is of |
21 |
course that some of the people complaining the most are actually in a |
22 |
minority. With terms as short as 1 year and 7 voting members there |
23 |
shouldn't really be much conflict here in any case. |
24 |
|
25 |
> |
26 |
> Example: there's a heated debate, and the majority of respondents |
27 |
> request that X is implemented. However, after reading all the arguments |
28 |
> you don't think that X is a good idea but you haven't managed to |
29 |
> convince others. Would you vote for X (as your electorate demands) |
30 |
> or against it (as you believe is better for the distro)? |
31 |
> |
32 |
|
33 |
against |
34 |
|
35 |
> |
36 |
> 2. Do you believe that the Council should proactively research the state |
37 |
> of affairs and make decisions whenever they believe the direction |
38 |
> of the distribution needs to be adjusted? Or should it be passive |
39 |
> and avoid involvement unless developers explicitly request Council's |
40 |
> intervention? |
41 |
> |
42 |
|
43 |
I actually think that individual council members to a great extent are |
44 |
doing this already, by being involved in the various projects. |
45 |
Ironically this has resulted in complaints by some about "conflicts of |
46 |
interest", that is demonstrating a certain lack of understanding of |
47 |
concepts. |
48 |
|
49 |
> |
50 |
> 3. Do you believe the developer community should hold the power |
51 |
> to veto or dissolve the Council at any point? Provided there's a global |
52 |
> developer vote agreeing on that. |
53 |
> |
54 |
|
55 |
They already have that every year during elections, so I'm not sure if |
56 |
adding additional layers of complexity is really worthwhile. But lets |
57 |
see the proposal similar to the debian general resolution and discuss it |
58 |
on its merits. |
59 |
|
60 |
-- |
61 |
Kristian Fiskerstrand |
62 |
OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net |
63 |
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 |