Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo Council nominee 2018/19 questions
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 08:24:23
Message-Id: 70563894-b5b7-6c24-16fb-4f04a7946e54@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo Council nominee 2018/19 questions by "Michał Górny"
1 On 06/27/2018 10:25 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
2 > (CC-ing the remaining people to remind them to be subscribed to -project
3 > and read archives)
4 >
5 > W dniu wto, 26.06.2018 o godzinie 09∶11 +0200, użytkownik Michał Górny
6 > napisał:
7 >> To improve readability of the thread, I'll ask my question in reply to
8 >> myself ;-).
9 >
10 > Three more questions from me:
11 >
12 >
13 > 1. Do you believe that Council members should respect the requests of
14 > the developer community even if they disagree with them? Or should
15 > Council members decide based on their own judgment of arguments
16 > presented?
17
18 Respect and agree are two different things. As with any board position,
19 once elected the duty of the individual is to what is perceived as the
20 best of the organization, despite any short term noise. One issue is of
21 course that some of the people complaining the most are actually in a
22 minority. With terms as short as 1 year and 7 voting members there
23 shouldn't really be much conflict here in any case.
24
25 >
26 > Example: there's a heated debate, and the majority of respondents
27 > request that X is implemented. However, after reading all the arguments
28 > you don't think that X is a good idea but you haven't managed to
29 > convince others. Would you vote for X (as your electorate demands)
30 > or against it (as you believe is better for the distro)?
31 >
32
33 against
34
35 >
36 > 2. Do you believe that the Council should proactively research the state
37 > of affairs and make decisions whenever they believe the direction
38 > of the distribution needs to be adjusted? Or should it be passive
39 > and avoid involvement unless developers explicitly request Council's
40 > intervention?
41 >
42
43 I actually think that individual council members to a great extent are
44 doing this already, by being involved in the various projects.
45 Ironically this has resulted in complaints by some about "conflicts of
46 interest", that is demonstrating a certain lack of understanding of
47 concepts.
48
49 >
50 > 3. Do you believe the developer community should hold the power
51 > to veto or dissolve the Council at any point? Provided there's a global
52 > developer vote agreeing on that.
53 >
54
55 They already have that every year during elections, so I'm not sure if
56 adding additional layers of complexity is really worthwhile. But lets
57 see the proposal similar to the debian general resolution and discuss it
58 on its merits.
59
60 --
61 Kristian Fiskerstrand
62 OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
63 fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature