1 |
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 8:32 PM Richard Yao <ryao@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> > On Sep 6, 2018, at 9:07 AM, Raymond Jennings <shentino@×××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> >> - Host a bug-bounty program. |
6 |
> This would need to be restricted to critical bugs. Otherwise, it would drain the foundation treasury very quickly. |
7 |
|
8 |
++ |
9 |
|
10 |
> We also would need to restrict this to non-developers, again to avoid draining the treasury. |
11 |
|
12 |
Uh, how does it drain the treasury less if we pay the same amount of |
13 |
money to a non-dev vs a dev? Wouldn't that actually discourage |
14 |
regular contributors from becoming devs, and potentially drive us to |
15 |
have to pay for more bounties since less stuff is getting fixed for |
16 |
free? |
17 |
|
18 |
Bounties would have to be limited to what we really need and can |
19 |
afford, but once you've gotten that far then there is really no reason |
20 |
to restrict who can apply for them. The goal is to fix the bug, |
21 |
right? |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
Rich |