| 1 |
El mar, 29-07-2014 a las 21:22 +0200, Michał Górny escribió: |
| 2 |
> Dnia 2014-07-29, o godz. 14:06:18 |
| 3 |
> Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> napisał(a): |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > Would like to ask for action about how to finally handle bash-completion |
| 6 |
> > on Gentoo. Looks like we are using a different approach as upstream to |
| 7 |
> > handle completions now, there was a try (one year ago) to try to switch |
| 8 |
> > to upstream style but seems that the revision implementing that was |
| 9 |
> > later dropped due some arguments. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Just to be clear, the arguments were not due to new bash-completion |
| 12 |
> itself but due to lack of completeness and documentation. If I recall |
| 13 |
> correctly, it was reverted simply because nobody was willing to do |
| 14 |
> the remaining work and we had no real documentation for the new system. |
| 15 |
> In other words, users upgraded, completions stopped working and didn't |
| 16 |
> know why or how to proceed. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> I don't know if the Council needs to say anything here. It's just |
| 19 |
> a matter of doing the work. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Yeah, I have seen new comments in relevant bug report and looks like |
| 23 |
that was the case. Sorry for the misunderstanding. There is no need to |
| 24 |
include it in agenda then |
Archives