1 |
On Sun, 15 Feb 2015 06:54:34 +0100 Michał Górny wrote: |
2 |
> Dnia 2015-02-15, o godz. 01:35:40 |
3 |
> Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@g.o> napisał(a): |
4 |
> |
5 |
> > On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 22:31:48 +0000 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
6 |
> > > On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 23:23:48 +0100 |
7 |
> > > Alexander Berntsen <bernalex@g.o> wrote: |
8 |
> > > > On 14/02/15 23:13, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
9 |
> > > > > That's how Git works. |
10 |
> > > > |
11 |
> > > > Consider contributors (Gentoo developers or not) that want to submit |
12 |
> > > > patches to a project. They should have access to the primary |
13 |
> > > > repository (git or not), and be able to contribute without being |
14 |
> > > > forced to use proprietary software. This is incredibly easy to |
15 |
> > > > facilitate, so I don't expect us to have a problem related to github |
16 |
> > > > and our social mission here. |
17 |
> > > |
18 |
> > > What if their ISP runs proprietary software to manage its network? Will |
19 |
> > > Gentoo accept patches by pigeon? (Obviously the postal service can't be |
20 |
> > > relied upon to not use proprietary software.) |
21 |
> > |
22 |
> > One should not confuse transparent data transmission mediator and |
23 |
> > active data management engine required to create, submit or |
24 |
> > apply changes. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> Please don't forget to request the contributor to sign a statement that |
27 |
> he didn't use proprietary text editor and/or git front-end. |
28 |
|
29 |
1. Failure of text editor or git frontend can't hinder development |
30 |
process seriously since other alternatives may be used. |
31 |
|
32 |
2. My guess is that most people don't use proprietary editors or |
33 |
git frontends in order to contribute to Gentoo, so this discussion |
34 |
becomes mostly philosophical rather than practical. |
35 |
|
36 |
Best regards, |
37 |
Andrew Savchenko |