| 1 |
Am Sonntag, 10. Juni 2018, 18:34:37 CEST schrieb Andreas K. Huettel: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > Additionally, the project liaison should be given some avenue of reprisal. |
| 4 |
> > First thought would be to introduce an all hands developer vote be called |
| 5 |
> > to unseat that project liaison. |
| 6 |
> > e.g. council appointed, but developer community removed. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> That could be doable, but we need to make sure that this is not an "easy |
| 9 |
> process". [...] |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Just to expand on this a bit, if any such rule is introduced, it should work |
| 12 |
the same way as the main rule - the liaison can only be unseated by |
| 13 |
constructive vote, i.e., voting for a replacement. This makes sure the office |
| 14 |
is never vacant. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Andreas K. Hüttel |
| 18 |
dilfridge@g.o |
| 19 |
Gentoo Linux developer |
| 20 |
(council, toolchain, perl, libreoffice, comrel) |
Archives