1 |
>>>>> On Fri, 21 Oct 2022, Robin H Johnson wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
>> So far we had followed the principle not to list authors in the |
4 |
>> acknowledgements (which is worded "the authors would like to thank"). |
5 |
>> If we start adding them for revision 1.2, then we'd have to add more |
6 |
>> names to the existing list. |
7 |
|
8 |
> How's the clarification now, making it clear those are the authors for |
9 |
> version 1.2? |
10 |
|
11 |
I'd still prefer a single list of acknowledgements in alphabetical |
12 |
order, without any of the authors included. (But I don't have a strong |
13 |
opinion, so if you absolutely want to have a separate paragraph for 1.2, |
14 |
then go ahead.) |
15 |
|
16 |
However, can we please keep the authors list (in the header) as-is? |
17 |
If we're now going to include people for adding a single sentence or |
18 |
suggestion, then we'd also have to list several (all?) of the persons |
19 |
who are listed in the original acknowledgements. |
20 |
|
21 |
>> Another small point: Whitespace in the new section doesn't follow the |
22 |
>> style in the rest of the GLEP, which uses two blank lines before and one |
23 |
>> blank line after section headings, as well as two spaces at the end of |
24 |
>> every sentence. (This is also what GLEP 2 says.) |
25 |
|
26 |
> Fixed - the blank lines were inconsistent in multiple places, but the |
27 |
> two spaces were correct. |
28 |
|
29 |
There shouldn't be double blank lines _after_ section headings (i.e. |
30 |
only a single blank line after "Specification" and "Rationale") [1]. |
31 |
|
32 |
Ulrich |
33 |
|
34 |
[1] https://www.gentoo.org/glep/glep-0002.html#id15 |