Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Representation of Gentoo on third-party platforms
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 01:22:01
Message-Id: f9167c85-e4dd-0dbf-3ed7-4ab0222c964d@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Representation of Gentoo on third-party platforms by "William L. Thomson Jr."
1 On 11/13/2016 02:18 AM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
2 > On Saturday, November 12, 2016 9:04:55 PM EST Michał Górny wrote:
3 >>> Nick Vinson <nvinson234@×××××.com> wrote:
4 >>> To my knowledge, no other project has the power to dismiss developers
5 >>> or issue punitive measures.
6 >>
7 >> QA lead actually has that power as well.
8 >
9 > IMHO only the Council and/or Trustees should have the power to remove people
10 > from the project. Only after a vote, not a single member deciding such.
11 >
12
13 The specific phrasing in this case from GLEP 48 is: " If a particular
14 developer persistently causes breakage, the QA team may request that
15 Comrel re-evaluates that developer's commit rights. Evidence of past
16 breakages will be presented with this request to Comrel."
17
18
19 --
20 Kristian Fiskerstrand
21 OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
22 fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature